[openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- From: "Nathan Whitehorn" <nathan.whitehorn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeosnetteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 13:44:13 -0400
> > In reply to Emmanuel Jacobs:
> > >> I think at a fist stage the interface is up and able to
> > > > negociate
> > >> LCP (authentication) and NCP (IPCP) then it can eventually go
> > >> opened when succesfully negotiated...
> > >
> > > Maybe I did reverse the correct use of "up" and "opened" in the
> > > previous mail... :-)
> >
> > Exact, but that's the idea behind this two states of a ppp
> > "interface"
> anyway:
> > 1) it's first opened
> > 2) link negociation protocols (LCP, NCP, and sub-protocols like
> > CHAP lies
> there)
> > 3) it's going up, eventually :-)
> > 4) ppp frames are sent/received, until...
> > 5) it's going down (and closed, obvioulsy).
>
> My problem was that PPP can be in the started phase while the
> interface is
> still down. This has no use. Why doesn't an up request start the
> interface
> so that they can be combined into the same request?
> Why did they split that system into down&initial and down&started?
> Maybe I
> will find out when I read everything two or three times?
It did have a use once. The idea was that the physical link could die
when there was no network traffic, thereby saving on phone line usage,
without requiring re-negotiation of the link when it came back. The
idea was to make it be able to go up and down transparently, as the
situation demanded.
-Nathan
--
Fortune Cookie Says:
Everything you know is wrong!
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- From: Waldemar Kornewald
- References:
- [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- From: Waldemar Kornewald
Other related posts:
- » [openbeosnetteam] PPP up/opened
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- From: Waldemar Kornewald
- [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- From: Waldemar Kornewald