[openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- From: "Emmanuel Jacobs" <emmanuel.jacobs@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <openbeosnetteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 17:38:49 +0200
----- Original Message -----
From: "Emmanuel Jacobs" <emmanuel.jacobs@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <openbeosnetteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2003 4:27 PM
Subject: [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
> I think at a fist stage the interface is up and able to negociate
LCP
> (autehntication) and NCP (IPCP) then it can eventually go opened
when
> succesfully negotiated...
Maybe I did reverse the correct use of "up" and "opened" in the
previous mail... :-)
Emmanuel
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- From: Philippe Houdoin
- References:
- [openbeosnetteam] PPP up/opened
- From: Waldemar Kornewald
- [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- From: Emmanuel Jacobs
Other related posts:
- » [openbeosnetteam] PPP up/opened
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- From: Philippe Houdoin
- [openbeosnetteam] PPP up/opened
- From: Waldemar Kornewald
- [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP up/opened
- From: Emmanuel Jacobs