[openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP API
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeosnetteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 02:14:56 +0200 CEST
Philippe Houdoin <philippe.houdoin@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Problem is that, currently, we don't have an Interface class defined
> already.
> Only a interface kernel module C api.
>
> And, at least for me, no time to design a new stack with classes.
> Be welcome to jump here ;-)
And that's exactly what we cannot use right now. You need a plain C API
or you might get into troubles "connecting" the different modules.
I don't think we'll have real shared libraries in R1 in the kernel -
but they would be needed for a real C++ API.
Adios...
Axel.
- References:
- [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP API
- From: Philippe Houdoin
Other related posts:
- » [openbeosnetteam] PPP API
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP API
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP API
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP API
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP API
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP API
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP API
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP API
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP API
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP API
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP API
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP API
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP API
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP API
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP API
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP API
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP API
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP API
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP API
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP API
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP API
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP API
- [openbeosnetteam] Re: PPP API
- From: Philippe Houdoin