David wrote: >> I just can't stand the "socket" feeling a /dev/net/socket entry >> give me. Our stack isn't made only of sockets. Asking a >> /dev/net/socket entry to stop sound a little weird, but whatever... > > Is there any reason we can't publish anothet entry point? Beside keeping a KISS design, no particular reason. :-) > I mean if we could have another driver that just did start/stop - > wouldn't that work? Yep, that would. But why have two drivers when we can have one? > It'd also stop us having to clutter up our > socket driver with start/stop things that (as you've said) don't > really belong there. 8-) I'd never said that! What I've said is renaming to /dev/net/stack make more sense, as when we ask it to "stop" or "start" it seem plain literral. It's when he's called /dev/net/socket that's it sound weird. However, enought filename discussion, time to go back home (and soon to commit) > Off to cut my grass! You have a grass!?! Lucky guy. -Philippe