[openbeosnetteam] Re: "No more B_KEEP_LOADED kernel modules" patch
- From: "David Reid" <dreid@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <openbeosnetteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 16:40:27 +0100
> I just can't stand the "socket" feeling a /dev/net/socket entry give me.
> Our stack isn't made only of sockets. Asking a /dev/net/socket entry to
> stop sound a little weird, but whatever...
Is there any reason we can't publish anothet entry point? I mean if we could
have another driver that just did start/stop - wouldn't that work? It'd also
stop us having to clutter up our socket driver with start/stop things that
(as you've said) don't really belong there.
Just a thought.
Off to cut my grass!
david
- References:
- [openbeosnetteam] Re: "No more B_KEEP_LOADED kernel modules" patch
- From: philippe . houdoin
Other related posts:
- » [openbeosnetteam] "No more B_KEEP_LOADED kernel modules" patch
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: "No more B_KEEP_LOADED kernel modules" patch
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: "No more B_KEEP_LOADED kernel modules" patch
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: "No more B_KEEP_LOADED kernel modules" patch
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: "No more B_KEEP_LOADED kernel modules" patch
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: "No more B_KEEP_LOADED kernel modules" patch
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: "No more B_KEEP_LOADED kernel modules" patch
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: "No more B_KEEP_LOADED kernel modules" patch
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: "No more B_KEEP_LOADED kernel modules" patch
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: "No more B_KEEP_LOADED kernel modules" patch
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: "No more B_KEEP_LOADED kernel modules" patch
- [openbeosnetteam] Re: "No more B_KEEP_LOADED kernel modules" patch
- From: philippe . houdoin