[openbeosnetteam] Re: Network preflet, the future?
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeosnetteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 18:32:59 +0200 CEST
"Philippe Houdoin" <philippe.houdoin@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Axel Dörfler wrote:
> > Errr... no :-)
> > 1) I wouldn't like to have the stack loaded automatically and
> > always
> > on boot too much - if no one is using it, why bother to start it?
> Good point.
> My bad.
The good thing is, however, that if the stack is able to load its
settings, it could also just start the first time it is needed; it
doesn't really need an extra "starter" application - if you don't use
something like inetd (have some servers only started on demand).
> Okay, so let's say the first time libnet.so will require to open("/
> dev/
> net/stack"), the stack will load, start and keep running...
> until death.
> If it's kernel module who start the stack (a network file system come
> to mind), the stack will be kept loaded, but in this case
> we must set the B_KEEP_LOADED flag to core module... bye bye stop/
> restart/reload stack feature.
> Well, the good thing here is this way, we have to other choice than
> make it bug-free ;-)
Since we are in control, we could even add a possibility to unload such
modules :-)
Bye,
Axel.
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeosnetteam] Re: Network preflet, the future?
- From: Philippe Houdoin
- References:
- [openbeosnetteam] Re: Network preflet, the future?
- From: Philippe Houdoin
Other related posts:
- » [openbeosnetteam] Network preflet, the future?
- » [openbeosnetteam] Network preflet, the future?
- » [openbeosnetteam] Network preflet, the future?
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Network preflet, the future?
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Network preflet, the future?
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Network preflet, the future?
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Network preflet, the future?
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Network preflet, the future?
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Network preflet, the future?
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Network preflet, the future?
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Network preflet, the future?
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Network preflet, the future?
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Network preflet, the future?
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Network preflet, the future?
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Network preflet, the future?
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Network preflet, the future?
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Network preflet, the future?
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Network preflet, the future?
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Network preflet, the future?
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Network preflet, the future?
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Network preflet, the future?
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Network preflet, the future?
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Network preflet, the future?
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Network preflet, the future?
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Network preflet, the future?
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Network preflet, the future?
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Network preflet, the future?
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Network preflet, the future?
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Network preflet, the future?
- [openbeosnetteam] Re: Network preflet, the future?
- From: Philippe Houdoin
- [openbeosnetteam] Re: Network preflet, the future?
- From: Philippe Houdoin