[openbeosnetteam] Re: MBuf
- From: Philippe Houdoin <philippe.houdoin@xxxxxxx>
- To: openbeosnetteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 18:13:37 +0200 (CEST)
> This is an old school implementation (when ANSI C ruled), if you had to
> reimplement it from scratch, you'd probably want to do it in a more OO
> way.
An C++ mbuf implementation, MBuf class:
http://rbmake.sourceforge.net/lib-mbuf.html
Feel free to expand on what you have in mind for "a more OO way" to implement
net buffer support.
I'm not totally please with my net_data idea (cloning bone_data support), and
every suggestion about building a better NetData class or whatever is welcomed.
-Philippe
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeosnetteam] Re: MBuf
- From: Waldemar Kornewald
- References:
- [openbeosnetteam] MBuf
- From: Waldemar Kornewald
- [openbeosnetteam] Re: MBuf
- From: Zenja
Other related posts:
- » [openbeosnetteam] MBuf
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: MBuf
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: MBuf
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: MBuf
- [openbeosnetteam] Re: MBuf
- From: Waldemar Kornewald
- [openbeosnetteam] MBuf
- From: Waldemar Kornewald
- [openbeosnetteam] Re: MBuf
- From: Zenja