[openbeosnetteam] Re: Kernel move...
- From: "Nathan Whitehorn" <nathan.whitehorn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeosnetteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 20:50:42 EDT (-0400)
> Why do you think they don't need a syscall? Why is the driver more
> extensible?
From the point of view of the kernel, adding special cases for anything
is usually a bad idea. Also, if we were to want to update that, and it
was compiled into the kernel, we would have to re-release the kernel
too, which would be unfortunate. Finally, there really isn't any
advantage to a syscall: open() for socket() and ioctl() for the rest
really work just as well, without any real speed problems.
-Nathan
--
Fortune Cookie Says:
One seldom sees a monument to a committee.
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeosnetteam] Re: Kernel move...
- From: David Reid
Other related posts:
- » [openbeosnetteam] Kernel move...
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Kernel move...
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Kernel move...
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Kernel move...
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Kernel move...
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Kernel move...
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Kernel move...
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Kernel move...
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Kernel move...
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Kernel move...
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Kernel move...
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Kernel move...
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Kernel move...
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Kernel move...
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Kernel move...
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Kernel move...
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Kernel move...
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Kernel move...
- [openbeosnetteam] Re: Kernel move...
- From: David Reid