[openbeosnetteam] Re: Interfaces
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeosnetteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 18:24:27 +0200 CEST
Nathan Whitehorn <nathanw@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> FreeBSD, at the least, allows interfaces to be "up" without assigned
> addresses in any family. The state of being up is logically
> independent
> from having an address -- it merely implies that the device is
> available
> to send packets.
And the same will be true (or even is already) for our stack. And BONE,
too, for that matter.
Bye,
Axel.
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeosnetteam] Re: Interfaces
- From: Waldemar Kornewald
- References:
- [openbeosnetteam] Re: Interfaces
- From: Nathan Whitehorn
Other related posts:
- » [openbeosnetteam] Interfaces
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Interfaces
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Interfaces
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Interfaces
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Interfaces
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Interfaces
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Interfaces
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Interfaces
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Interfaces
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Interfaces
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Interfaces
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Interfaces
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Interfaces
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Interfaces
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Interfaces
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Interfaces
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Interfaces
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Interfaces
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Interfaces
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Interfaces
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Interfaces
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Interfaces
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Interfaces
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Interfaces
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Interfaces
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Interfaces
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Interfaces
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Interfaces
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Interfaces
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Interfaces
- [openbeosnetteam] Re: Interfaces
- From: Waldemar Kornewald
- [openbeosnetteam] Re: Interfaces
- From: Nathan Whitehorn