[openbeosnetteam] Re: [Fwd: New Networking Project...]
- From: Waldemar Kornewald <Waldemar.Kornewald@xxxxxx>
- To: openbeosnetteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 17:43:47 +0100
Philippe Houdoin wrote:
Anyway, we did talk Waldemar and I about this possible road.
In particular, we agreed on a possible port of the FreeBSD 5.x net
stack, making it an huge stand-alone module.
This big module, in that scenario, will replace the current core,
protocols and some of the interfaces stack modules.
Yep, that's dropping modular design, mostly.
I would better say: we want to start with something that works and then
slowly adapt the code to our needs. The FreeBSD developers are
interested in our adaptions, too, so we could work together with them.
But I fear that nor me nor him want or can do it (time issue) was the
biggest negative point.
We may find more interrest in David's "Marrow" project instead, as it's
sound more like "BSD stack meet BONE".
Waldemar discussed with him, but since I dunno how it came.
That is an interesting project, but I want to keep our code as much as
possible synch'ed with FreeBSD, so their changes and fixes get into our
repository more easily. I do not know how much behind the current
FreeBSD code Marrow is and how much work an update would mean.
And if you're positive, any work done in that direction yet?
Nope. Not on my side.
Neither on mine. I want to finish PPP in the next three moths and for
this I spend all my (little) free coding time on it. So, you cannot
expect any other progress from me. Sorry.
Bye,
Waldemar
Other related posts:
- » [openbeosnetteam] [Fwd: New Networking Project...]
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: [Fwd: New Networking Project...]
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: [Fwd: New Networking Project...]
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: [Fwd: New Networking Project...]
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: [Fwd: New Networking Project...]
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: [Fwd: New Networking Project...]
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: [Fwd: New Networking Project...]
In particular, we agreed on a possible port of the FreeBSD 5.x net stack, making it an huge stand-alone module.
This big module, in that scenario, will replace the current core, protocols and some of the interfaces stack modules.
Yep, that's dropping modular design, mostly.
We may find more interrest in David's "Marrow" project instead, as it's sound more like "BSD stack meet BONE".
Waldemar discussed with him, but since I dunno how it came.
And if you're positive, any work done in that direction yet?
Nope. Not on my side.