[openbeosnetteam] Re: Fwd: NetKit API prototype...
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeosnetteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 14:59:04 CET (+0100)
> Well, we won't have one library, we'll have one for C and one for c++
> , so
> having one depend on the other is *BOGUS* and again I will -1
> attempts to
> drive it down that line. Again, libnet.so == BSD sockets api,
> libnetapi.so
> == C++ Be API, they should never meet.
The C++ Be API is just a wrapper for the BSD API, you can still call
BNetEndpoint::Socket() and use the result with the BSD function set
without interfering - and we'd have to provide the same functionality.
Of course it's possible to see both, the BSD API and the C++ Be API as
a wrapper for the net_server functionality, but is it worth the effort
to develop both of them independently?
> It's *BOGUS* as if I'm writing a c++ app and want to talk to the
> server
> using C++, why should I have to worry about a C library being loaded
> with
> all the complications it can cause? No need for it really...
What complications does this cause?
Adios...
Axel.
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeosnetteam] Re: Fwd: NetKit API prototype...
- From: David Reid
Other related posts:
- » [openbeosnetteam] Fwd: NetKit API prototype...
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Fwd: NetKit API prototype...
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Fwd: NetKit API prototype...
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Fwd: NetKit API prototype...
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Fwd: NetKit API prototype...
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Fwd: NetKit API prototype...
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Fwd: NetKit API prototype...
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Fwd: NetKit API prototype...
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Fwd: NetKit API prototype...
- » [openbeosnetteam] Re: Fwd: NetKit API prototype...
- [openbeosnetteam] Re: Fwd: NetKit API prototype...
- From: David Reid