[openbeosnetteam] Re: Everybody...

A bunch of us were talking last night on IRC and we'll be there again in a
while!

irc.openprjects.com
#openbeosnetkit

david

----- Original Message -----
From: "Emmanuel Jacobs" <emmanuel.jacobs@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <openbeosnetteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:43 PM
Subject: [openbeosnetteam] Everybody...


>
> ...welcomes Bruno G. Albuquerque from Dr. Zoidberg Enterprises :-)
>
> Thanks for joining this list.
>
>     Emmanuel
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Erik Reid" <reide@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <openbeosnetteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 4:27 PM
> Subject: [openbeosnetteam] Re: Me as well...
>
>
> > Quoth "David Reid":
> > >>
> > >> Forgive me for looking like a fool, but what are teams, and shutdown?
> :)
> > >> (I have done socket code on unix before, just don't recognize the
> terms,
> > >> haven't done anything to rough.)
> > >
> > >shutdown is a call to shutdown a socket...
> > >
> > >teams are what beos calls threads under a particular process, if that
> makes
> > >it any clearer :)  Look in the bebook!
> >
> > Makes sense. Thanks! :)
> >
> > >>
> > >> >Would be Nice To Haves
> > >> >
> > >> >- IPv6
> > >>
> > >> I'm definitely interested in this, as well as a few other IP specs
such
> as
> > >> bridging and tunneling using a few different methods(especially
> IPSec!).
> > >> I think BeOS already did NAT?
> > >
> > >Yes, but I think we need to look at that.  It would be cool to add
> > >hooks/support for pf as well...
> >
> > Definitely some form of packet filtering.  Is there a tcpdump for BeOS
> currently?
> >
> > >> Now, I don't have a lot of experience with deep OS stuff, but
wouldn't
> it
> > >be
> > >> possible to have a set of 'emulation' libraries or something, which
> could
> > >be
> > >> written on top of our OpenBeOS library in order to provide binary
> > >compatibility,
> > >> but still let us advance R1 in small ways?
> > >
> > >I guess so.  I wouldn't be interested in writing them, but no doubt
some
> > >other people in need of self flagellation will be.
> >
> > Fair enough.  I suspect we'll get leaned on from the rest of the
OpenBeOS
> > team to have binary compatibility, which is really the only reason I say
> it. :P
> >
>
>
>

Other related posts: