[nvda] Re: video system hooks

  • From: "Derek Roberts" <bigd.vi.guy@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <nvda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 14:33:53 -0400

Yeah, kinda destroys the whole portable thing, considering you need to 
install stuff on any machine you run it on. But yeah people are getting this 
all mixed up...
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: developer
  To: nvda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 2:27 PM
  Subject: [nvda] Re: video system hooks

  yes i know but i hate jaws portable
  reason is that i need install
  on any computer video intercept this is stupid for me

    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Hrvoje Katić
    To: nvda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 7:46 PM
    Subject: [nvda] Re: video system hooks

    You know very good that JAWS 7, 9 and 10 also contain a portable 
variant. You just need to install Video Intercept on a computer where you 
are using Jaws and run a portable version from a USB flash drive. So it 
shouldn't destroy NVDA's portability. The only disadvantage will be that the 
user needs to install intercept to use it.
    On 28.5.2009. 19:11, developer wrote:
      do you know example of jaws.
      jaw is not portable with system hooks
      so system hooks
      bye bye
        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: Josh
        To: nvda email list
        Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 4:02 PM
        Subject: [nvda] video system hooks


        video system hooks will not decrease portability. System access is a 
good example of a portable screen readerwith video system hookss.


        Josh email is    jkenn337@xxxxxxxxx
        msn: kenn6498ku@xxxxxxxxxxx
        skype: jkenn337

Other related posts: