On 16/02/2009 3:05 PM, Gene wrote:
My point was that just because something isn't restricted doesn't mean it isn't legally restricted. I can copy many programs I own because they don't have copy protection, but that doesn't mean it is legal. Other programs have copy protection, but that doesn't mean that all those that don't are okay to copy.I disagree with your analogy. Via voice and Eloquence are programs that are bundled with other programs in many instances. It is not the same as someone downloading an illegal copy of something or copying or transferring something illegally.
If the owner of Eloquence wants to restrict the program, why does it allow unrestricted use when the program is installed with Window-eyes and only restricted use when installed with JAWS?
One reason might be that it's easier to use SAPI4 than to use a custom API.If you read the letter I linked in my previous email, you will note that Nuance's distributor is suggesting that this is not legal. Unless you can provide legal advice to the contrary, we cannot afford to take the risk. It is really that simple. Similarly, we were asked to withdraw our ViaVoice driver from NVDA some time ago and we complied.
Anyway, the main point is that people should not ask where they can find a copy on this list. This is why I made my original post. No one is asking for instructions on how to use a legal copy, because no instructions are required.
-- James (Jamie) Teh Email/MSN Messenger/Jabber: jamie@xxxxxxxxxxx Web site: http://www.jantrid.net/ To post messages to the list send email to nvda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To modify your NVDA Email settings go to: http://www.freelists.org/list/nvda Thank you for your continued support of Nonvisual Desktop Access, an open source free screen reader for Microsoft Windows: http://www.nvda-project.org/ To get the latest NVDA snapshot: http://www.nvda-project.org/snapshots/ Report bugs or make feature requests at: http://trac.nvda-project.org/ Message Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/nvda