[nvda] Re: NVDA and video intercept VS display hooks.
- From: James Teh <jamie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: nvda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 09:41:17 +1000
Jim Grimsby JR. wrote:
Well the bottom line here is we do not live in a perfect world and the
bottom line here is the job of the screen readr to provide access not the
job of the programmer.
I disagree. It is always better to have an application accessible out of
the box than have to implement all sorts of dirty hacks to make it
accessible in a screen reader. Doing the latter frequently results in
accessibility which is flawed and unreliable at best. I agree that a
screen reader should try to implement other methods where the developers
absolutely refuse to change anything to fix their inaccessible
applications, but where there is hope of a fix, this should always be
tried. It is precisely this ideal of placing the onus on the screen
reader that has led to so much poor accessibility in the Windows world.
Aside from all of this, accessibility can have other less obvious
benefits. For example, there is no need to use non-standard widgets if
the standard ones can achieve the same task; why reinvent the wheel?
Similarly, if accessibility is so hard to implement, there is a problem
with the separation of user interface from core logic, which is a sign
of very bad application design, something which is becoming all too
common in today's "release first, reliability later" world.
I'm not the type to say "if an application isn't made accessible, tough
luck; we can't support it". You're quite right - we do not live in a
perfect world and having this attitude is just biting off one's nose to
spite one's face. However, nor do I believe in the opposite idea of "we
shouldn't have to request that applications be made accessible; we
should just deal with the best we can and suffer poor accessibility".
Jamie
--
James Teh
Email: jamie@xxxxxxxxxxx
WWW: http://www.jantrid.net/
MSN Messenger: jamie@xxxxxxxxxxx
Jabber: jteh@xxxxxxxxxx
Yahoo: jcs_teh
To post messages to the list send email to
nvda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To modify your NVDA Email settings go to:
http://www.freelists.org/list/nvda
Thank you for your continued support of Nonvisual Desktop Access, an open
source free screen reader for Microsoft Windows:
http://www.nvda-project.org/
Report bugs or make feature requests at:
http://trac.nvda-project.org/
Message Archive:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/nvda
- Follow-Ups:
- [nvda] How to make an application accessible to NVDA
- From: Jonathan Duddington
- [nvda] Re: NVDA and video intercept VS display hooks.
- From: Jim Grimsby JR.
- References:
- [nvda] Re: NVDA and video intercept VS display hooks.
- From: Jim Grimsby JR.
Other related posts:
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and video intercept VS display hooks.
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and video intercept VS display hooks.
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and video intercept VS display hooks.
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and video intercept VS display hooks.
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and video intercept VS display hooks.
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and video intercept VS display hooks.
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and video intercept VS display hooks.
Well the bottom line here is we do not live in a perfect world and the bottom line here is the job of the screen readr to provide access not the job of the programmer.
- [nvda] How to make an application accessible to NVDA
- From: Jonathan Duddington
- [nvda] Re: NVDA and video intercept VS display hooks.
- From: Jim Grimsby JR.
- [nvda] Re: NVDA and video intercept VS display hooks.
- From: Jim Grimsby JR.