[nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- From: James Teh <jamie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: nvda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 11:18:08 +1000
David Tanner wrote:
Don't take me wrong, I am not criticizing NVDA here. However, isn't that a bit
much to expect for the non-techie user?
I agree. However, this is beyond our control. The only way to attain
accessibility in OpenOffice is via Java accessibility, and that requires
the installation of the JRE and Java Access Bridge. This is not an NVDA
requirement; it is an OpenOffice accessibility requirement. If OO ever
implements IAccessible 2, things will be less complicated, but failing
that, there is nothing we can do.
Jamie
--
James Teh
Email: jamie@xxxxxxxxxxx
WWW: http://www.jantrid.net/
MSN Messenger: jamie@xxxxxxxxxxx
Jabber: jteh@xxxxxxxxxx
Yahoo: jcs_teh
To post messages to the list send email to
nvda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To modify your NVDA Email settings go to:
http://www.freelists.org/list/nvda
Thank you for your continued support of Nonvisual Desktop Access, an open
source free screen reader for Microsoft Windows:
http://www.nvda-project.org/
To get the latest NVDA snapshot:
http://www.nvda-project.org/snapshots/
Report bugs or make feature requests at:
http://trac.nvda-project.org/
Message Archive:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/nvda
- Follow-Ups:
- [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- From: David Tanner
- References:
- [nvda] NVDA and open office
- From: Aruni Sharma
- [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- From: John Greer
- [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- From: David Tanner
- [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- From: James Teh
- [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- From: David Tanner
Other related posts:
- » [nvda] NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- » [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
Don't take me wrong, I am not criticizing NVDA here. However, isn't that a bit much to expect for the non-techie user?
- [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- From: David Tanner
- [nvda] NVDA and open office
- From: Aruni Sharma
- [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- From: John Greer
- [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- From: David Tanner
- [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- From: James Teh
- [nvda] Re: NVDA and open office
- From: David Tanner