OK, I'll send it to you as soon as I decide which one. Koichi Yasutani - a.k.a. Steve + MP Lakewood, WA U.S.A. 2010 / 12 / 10 06:33 PST On Dec 10, 2010, at 0620 , Eric Welch wrote: > Okay send me a photo that needs that kind of work. Make it a full image, but > jpeg it so that it's less than 10 megs. > > On Dec 10, 2010, at 4:51 AM, Koichi Mac wrote: > >> The slide looks identical to the untouched JPG I sent. So the sky is >> kind of washed out. >> >> If there is a way to combine same image scanned at different contrast / >> brightness levels, I would like to know how. That would be god-send >> technique for my kind of photos which tends to have wide gap between bright >> and dark areas, like ones I sent last night about Snake River. >> >> On Dec 9, 2010, at 0617 , Eric Welch wrote: >> >>> Look at the slide. What do the clouds look like? Do they have more detail? >>> If so, reduce the contrast and scan it for the sky. Then scan it again for >>> the foreground. Then use Photoshop to combine the two images into one. >>> There's easy ways to do that with such an image. If you can scan both ways >>> I can show you how to combine them. >>> >>> If there is no more detail in the slide than we're seeing here, then you're >>> out of luck. This is what split neutral density filters are for, and in the >>> digital realm, HDR. >>> >>> On Dec 8, 2010, at 11:34 PM, Koichi Mac wrote: >>> >>>> Well, I have to think how much of that "too much blue" is due to the >>>> feature of Velvia film and lack of skylight filter. Yeah, the loss of >>>> cloud detail bothers me a little. >>>> >>>> Let me see if I can find the original slide again and rescan……OK, here >>>> it is. This is untouched, at 1.0 default brightness setting. Seems >>>> slightly underexposed……by 1/3 stop? The cloud does not seem all that much >>>> better (included the original photos below). So it means I can't do much >>>> on the cloud. Or, does it look right to you? Do you think I tend to >>>> over-brighten? >>>> >>>> <3x5 306.jpeg> >>>> >>>> Have been pretty busy scanning slides and editing iTunes music files in >>>> the past week. Just sprayed straight bleach to kill mildew in my bathroom >>>> - halfway. Didn't use respirator - now kinda hard to breathe. Cigarette >>>> doesn't taste good to me at this moment. >>>> >>>> On Nov 30, 2010, at 2036 , Eric Welch wrote: >>>> >>>>> Too much blue in the first two images. They needed that skylight filter. >>>>> :-D >>>>> >>>>> The sky is also pretty blown out. Much better to drop the exposure since >>>>> there's plenty of detail in the foreground. Back in the film days, this >>>>> is the kind of photo the split gradient filters were for. >>>>> >>>>> From: Koichi Mac <nikonf3tmd4@xxxxxxx> >>>>> Date: November 30, 2010 8:11:45 PST >>>>> To: Nikon F4 <nikonf4@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Subject: [nikonf4] Shades of Green >>>>> Reply-To: nikonf4@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> >>>>> Not sure if I ever sent this out before. But if I did, they were from >>>>> PS-50 digital. These are scanned from Nikon F3, AFS 28-70/2.8 Fuji >>>>> Velvia. Which one looks better? >>>>> >>>>> This one no black point, white point adjustment. >>>> <3x5 306A.jpeg> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 0.02% black point, white point. Looks brightened up but lost more cloud >>>>> details. >>>> <3x5 306B BWP002.jpeg> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> This one looks best among other same shots. >>>> <3x5 310.jpeg> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Sent medium, 350 KB. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Koichi Yasutani - a.k.a. Steve + MP >>>>> Lakewood, WA U.S.A. >>>>> 2010 / 11 / 30 20:12 PST >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> Eric >>> >>> Most people make the mistake of thinking design is what it looks like. >>> People think it’s this veneer — that the designers are handed this box and >>> told, ‘Make it look good!’ That’s not what we think design is. It’s not >>> just what it looks like and feels like. Design is how it works. – Steve Jobs >>> >> >> > > Eric > > "The theory of a free press is that truth will emerge from free discussion, > not that it will be presented perfectly and instantly in any one account." – > Walter Lippmann >