[nikonf4] Re: Meteors / Aurora
- From: Koichi Mac <nikonf3tmd4@xxxxxxx>
- To: nikonf4@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 04:57:20 -0800
30" at ISO 64 and f/1.4 sounds just about right. I was using @ISO 50
and f/11. I know there is no chance in hell that film can compete with current
dSLRs.
Koichi Yasutani - a.k.a. Steve + MP
Lakewood, WA U.S.A.
2010 / 12 / 10 04:57 PST
On Dec 9, 2010, at 0623 , Eric Welch wrote:
> The difference is film has no chance competing with a D700 at high ISO. I
> believe that would be 13 seconds. I remember shooting Northern Lights in
> Canada back in the early 80s on Kodachrome 64 and a Pentax LX and 50mm 1.4. I
> think the exposure - picked by the camera reading off the film (the LX was
> one of the first to read ambient exposures reflected off film) - was about 30
> seconds.
>
> On Dec 8, 2010, at 11:50 PM, Koichi Mac wrote:
>
>> Um…that's for Windows, isn't it? Let me see if I can check the
>> metadata. Got it, here is PNG. So that's 13 seconds? or 1/13 second? -
>> much shorter than I anticipated anyway. I have a shot of northern lights /
>> aurora, spent about 8 minutes with film and wouldn't show up spectacularly
>> like that, suffering a massive reciprocity failure.
>>
>> <Screen shot 2010-12-08 at 11.46.01 .png>
>>
>> On Nov 30, 2010, at 2016 , John Osthus wrote:
>>
>>> I believe I did not strip it out of the EXIF.
>>>
>>> Do you have Opanda?
>>>
>>> http://www.opanda.com/en/iexif/
>>>
>>> Nice to have. A right click leads you to all of the data.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Koichi Mac [mailto:nikonf3tmd4@xxxxxxx]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 9:56 PM
>>> To: John Osthus
>>> Cc: Nikon F4
>>> Subject: Re: Meteors
>>>
>>> Thanks for the forward. Shows really nice. Mind to share data?
>>>
>>> On Nov 30, 2010, at 1945 , John Osthus wrote:
>>>
>>>> From: John Osthus [mailto:josthus@xxxxxxxxxxx]
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 8:53 PM
>>>> To: 'Eric Welch'
>>>> Subject: FW: Meteors
>>>>
>>>> Hi Eric
>>>>
>>>> Thanks again for the Audio help.
>>>>
>>>> If you look at this at 100 percent you can see 4 meteors, faintly. All
>>> near the center of the screen sort of.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> JO
>>>>
>>>> From: John Osthus [mailto:josthus@xxxxxxxxxxx]
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 8:46 PM
>>>> To: 'jaypax@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
>>>> Subject: Meteors
>>>>
>>>> Jay,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your interest.
>>>>
>>>> This is a low-rez version of a NEF I shot with the D700.
>>>>
>>>> There are a couple of faint trails near the milky way near the center of
>>> the image, and a couple of smaller traces on the left center. You have to
>>> enlarge to 100 percent to see them well.
>>>>
>>>> Not show stoppers when it comes to meteors - these were accidents while I
>>> was shooting the milky way hoping for a meteor. I didn't see any of these
>>> the camera caught.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> John
>>>> <_DEF0746.jpg>
Other related posts:
