[nikonf4] Re: D400
- From: Koichi Mac <nikonf3tmd4@xxxxxxx>
- To: nikonf4@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 04:49:41 -0700
If the camera is that great, why the hell did Nikon assign 7000?
Should have been more like D400.
Koichi Yasutani - a.k.a. Steve + MP
Lakewood, WA U.S.A.
2010 / 11 / 6 04:50 PDT
On Nov 5, 2010, at 1804 , Eric Welch wrote:
> It's much better than the D300s. It's 16.2 megapixels. It has a much more
> advanced sensor and much higher quality ISO performance. Autofocus is really
> accurate and fast. The exposure meter has twice the pixels as the D300s. It's
> now the second highest resolution camera Nikon makes behind the D3X which
> costs at least about $6,000 more. And it does 1080p 24fps video. The only
> Nikon that does. For $1,200.
> On Nov 5, 2010, at 5:23 PM, Koichi Mac wrote:
>> What's so special about D7000 over D300? I thought it was a mere slight
>> upgrade of D5000, but maybe I should change mind over it.
Other related posts:
