[net-gold] [Workers' Compensation] House Cleaners Not Employees
- From: "David P. Dillard" <jwne@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Temple University Net-Gold Archive <net-gold@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Temple Gold Discussion Group <TEMPLE-GOLD@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Net-Gold <net-gold@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Educator Gold <Educator-Gold@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Educator Gold <Educator-Gold@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, K12AdminLIFE <K12AdminLIFE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Net-Platinum <net-platinum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, NetGold <netgold@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Net-Gold @ Nabble" <ml-node+3172864-337556105@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, K-12ADMINLIFE <K12ADMIN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, net-gold@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 10:21:28 -0400 (EDT)
.
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 04:42:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jon L. Gelman <jon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: Net-Gold@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: net-gold@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Net-Gold] [Workers' Compensation] House Cleaners Not Employees
.
[Workers' Compensation]
House Cleaners Not Employees
A homeowner was not responsible under
workers' compensation law for the
injuries suffered by someone who was
hired to clean the house. The Court
held that individuals hired to
perform basic cleaning services
such as dusting, vacuuming, sweeping
and bathroom cleaning did not
establish an employee-employer
relationship.
The reviewing tribunal, in affirming
the trial court's decision, held
that the relationship did not meet
either "the right to control"
or "relative nature of the work" tests.
Lopez v. Moser, Docket No.
A-1535-09T21535-09T2,
NJ App. Div., 201 WL 2696754,
Decided July 9, 2010.
Click here for more information on
how Jon L Gelman can assist you in a
claim for workers' Compensation claim
benefits. You may e-mail
Jon Gelman or call 1-973-696-7900.
--
Posted By Jon L. Gelman to
Workers' Compensation at
7/10/2010 07:42:00 AM
.
Other related posts:
- » [net-gold] [Workers' Compensation] House Cleaners Not Employees - David P. Dillard
