Thanks EVERYONE for assistance. I threw a lot in one post. I agree with all the suggestions. I'm biased against moths I've already seen :) Jackie On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:28 AM, kjchilds <kjchilds@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I think Bob is right that 0579 is Pleuroprucha insulsaria and your ID > of 7136 Cyclophora packardi looks good to me. > Hopefully someone else will chime in on the 7046...your ID may be right > but it's too worn for my untrained eye to make the call. > > Ken Childs > Henderson, TN > Chester County > > http://tinyurl.com/FinishFlagFarmsMoths > http://www.finishflagfarms.com > > ------------------------------ > *From:* kjchilds <kjchilds@xxxxxxxxx> > *To:* "ncsc-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ncsc-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > *Sent:* Tuesday, May 15, 2012 8:28 AM > *Subject:* [ncsc-moths] Re: Emeralds and Waves > > I don't have time right now to take a close look at all of them but 1234 > looks like it might be a Leptostales or something close. The one labeled > 7048 appears to be a 7071 Chlorochlamys chloroleucaria, Blackberry Looper. > > Ken Childs > Henderson, TN > Chester County > > http://tinyurl.com/FinishFlagFarmsMoths > http://www.finishflagfarms.com > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Jackie Nelson <ephemeropterae@xxxxxxxxx> > *To:* ncsc-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Sent:* Monday, May 14, 2012 11:33 PM > *Subject:* [ncsc-moths] Emeralds and Waves > > OK, here's my stab at some new (to me) Emeralds and cousins. Fascinating > to now notice seasonal coloration. If correct, the 3 I identified would > all be lifers. > > Image 1234 looks like it belongs in this group, but if not, any leads > appreciated. Same for IMG 0579 > > Any confirmation of ID'd moths and/or the unidentifieds would be greatly > appreciated. > > These were all taken in early May. > > Jackie > NW NC, Southern Blue Ridge mtns > > > > > > > -- <") ( \ / |`` Jackie