[nasional_list] [ppiindia] Heretical to the Asia concept

  • From: "Ambon" <sea@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <"Undisclosed-Recipient:;"@freelists.org>
  • Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 04:00:58 +0100

** Forum Nasional Indonesia PPI India Mailing List **
** Untuk bergabung dg Milis Nasional kunjungi: 
** Situs Milis: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia/ **
** Beasiswa dalam negeri dan luar negeri S1 S2 S3 dan post-doctoral 
scholarship, kunjungi 
http://informasi-beasiswa.blogspot.com **

Heretical to the Asia concept
By KAZUO OGOURA


The European Union is a community founded on the concept of Europe. This 
concept has been nurtured by the historical consciousness of Europeans to 
overcome national rivalries and to maintain European traditions. The process of 
consolidating such consciousness has, however, been accompanied by a process of 
excluding anything that is un-European -- that is, anything, whether political 
or religious, that deviates from the norm of being "European." 
Christianity offers an obvious example. The Roman Catholic Church, in 
particular, has maintained its orthodoxy by excluding the heretical. One 
feature of monotheistic Christian civilization is the elimination of heresy. 

This phenomenon is actually evident to a greater or lesser degree in all 
religions, but in historical terms it has not featured as prominently in 
Buddhism or Confucianism, for instance, as it has in Islam or Christianity. 

The attitude of modern-day Europe to issues like human rights and the death 
penalty exudes this logic of eliminating heresy to protect European values. 

When an extreme rightwing regime came to power in Austria, all of Europe vented 
its criticism. One could say that this reaction reflected more than just regret 
over Nazism and warning against the rise of new racism. It was in fact a part 
of the process of protecting European values by excluding the heretical. 

Similarly, a move is afoot to revoke the observer status of the United States 
and Japan on the Council of Europe's Committee of Ministers over the issue of 
the abolition of capital punishment. This can only be viewed as a manifestation 
of Europe's refusal to accept as peers and include in its group those who 
violate "European values," even if they are developed, democratic states like 
Japan and the United States. 

As the concept of Europe has taken root, Europeans have maintained -- in 
parallel with the exclusion of heresy -- a constant awareness of that which is 
un-European, the "other." 

We must not forget that throughout its history Europe has affirmed its identity 
by juxtaposing itself with the other. The other was at different times Muslim 
culture, primitive societies refusing European enlightenment, non-Christian 
societies, autocratic communist states, U.S. Fordism, or even Japanese-style 
business practice. 

Indeed, throughout its history Europe has needed an other, has created 
"others," and has built up its own identity in the context of its opposition to 
and contrast with the other. In this sense, the process of European integration 
has been an exercise of rejecting and pushing aside "others" as well as an 
exercise of assimilating different elements. 

Asia, meanwhile, is not a concept that Asians made themselves but is, rather, 
something that Europeans invented for their own convenience. In modern times -- 
that is, after the collapse of the Chinese kingdom and the colonization of Asia 
by Europeans -- except for the shared history of anti-colonial movements in 
Asia and Africa, almost nothing has been done by Asians to exercise political 
leadership or organize a social movement for the creation of Asia as an entity, 
to conceive of an "other" against which to contrast it, to separate themselves 
from that other, and to deepen the concept of Asia. 

Asia does not need the concept of "others" to consolidate the concept of Asia. 
In fact, "others" exist within Asia itself, rather than outside, due to rising 
nationalism in some Asian countries. 

In addition to the elimination of heresy and the presence of the other, there 
is another important idea that Asian people have to bear in mind when 
considering the European community. This is the idea of overcoming nationalism. 
The concept that nationalism must be overcome has its roots in a history of 
fierce conflicts among nation-states. 

European history consists of conflicts between nationalisms and antagonism 
between nation-states. It was the process of overcoming such rivalries that led 
to the European community. That effort was based not on the simple objective of 
putting an end to war but on the conviction that overcoming nationalism was 
vital to the creation of an interdependent world. 

Turning our eyes to Asia, however, we see a divided Korean Peninsula and a 
China that still clings to the issue of Taiwan. Under these circumstances, 
nationalism remains a highly important rallying cry for national unification in 
East Asia, particularly in China and South Korea. There is no national or 
ethnic consensus that nationalism is something that must be overcome; on the 
contrary, there is every indication that emphasizing nationalism will remain an 
important element of these countries' domestic politics and foreign policy for 
some time to come. 

Under these circumstances we should ask ourselves how an East Asian Community 
can be formed without overcoming nationalism. This question raises serious 
issues for the people of East Asia. In this context, Japan can play a key role 
as virtually the only industrialized democratic country in Asia, because it no 
longer needs such nationalism as a force for national unification. 

Therefore, in the interests of all of Asia, Japan must refrain from resorting 
needlessly to parochial nationalism that serves no purpose other than to divert 
economic or political frustration onto others. East Asian neighbors of Japan 
should, on their part, refrain from using the question of the past damage 
inflicted upon them by Japan for the purpose of their own domestic political 
convenience or of diplomatic maneuvering vis-a-vis Japan. 

People and nations in East Asia could, in their endeavor to reach a consensus 
for forming an East Asian Community, learn much from this history of forming 
the concept of Europe. 

Kazuo Ogoura, professor of political science at Aoyama Gakuin University, is 
president of the Japan Foundation. He served as Japanese ambassador to Vietnam 
(1994-95), South Korea (1997-99) and France (1999-2002). 

The Japan Times: Jan. 16, 2006
(C) All rights reserved


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



***************************************************************************
Berdikusi dg Santun & Elegan, dg Semangat Persahabatan. Menuju Indonesia yg 
Lebih Baik, in Commonality & Shared Destiny. 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia
***************************************************************************
__________________________________________________________________________
Mohon Perhatian:

1. Harap tdk. memposting/reply yg menyinggung SARA (kecuali sbg otokritik)
2. Pesan yg akan direply harap dihapus, kecuali yg akan dikomentari.
3. Reading only, http://dear.to/ppi 
4. Satu email perhari: ppiindia-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
5. No-email/web only: ppiindia-nomail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
6. kembali menerima email: ppiindia-normal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    ppiindia-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



** Forum Nasional Indonesia PPI India Mailing List **
** Untuk bergabung dg Milis Nasional kunjungi: 
** Situs Milis: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia/ **
** Beasiswa dalam negeri dan luar negeri S1 S2 S3 dan post-doctoral 
scholarship, kunjungi 
http://informasi-beasiswa.blogspot.com **

Other related posts:

  • » [nasional_list] [ppiindia] Heretical to the Asia concept