[nasional_list] [ppiindia] Enough of his excuses: Blair must be impeached over Iraq

  • From: "Ambon" <sea@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <"Undisclosed-Recipient:;"@freelists.org>
  • Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:19:14 +0100

** Forum Nasional Indonesia PPI India Mailing List **
** Untuk bergabung dg Milis Nasional kunjungi: 
** Situs Milis: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia/ **
** Beasiswa dalam negeri dan luar negeri S1 S2 S3 dan post-doctoral 
scholarship, kunjungi 
http://informasi-beasiswa.blogspot.com 
**http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1682807,00.html



Enough of his excuses: Blair must be impeached over Iraq 

The only way parliament can regain the trust of disaffected voters is to admit 
that it was wrong to support the war 

Michael Rose
Tuesday January 10, 2006
The Guardian 


Wars are won when the people, government and army work together for a common 
cause in which they genuinely believe. Whereas the people may be initially 
uncertain about military intervention, politicians will often be the strongest 
advocates - blinded by the imperatives of their political views. It will 
invariably be military commanders who are most cautious about using force - for 
they understand better than most the consequences of engaging in war. 
Although in a true democracy they must remain subordinate to their political 
masters, they have a clear responsibility to point out when political 
strategies are flawed or inadequately resourced. Since they might also have to 
ask their soldiers to sacrifice their lives, they must be assured that a war is 
just, legal and the last resort available. Yet three years ago this country was 
somehow led by the prime minister into war in Iraq where few, if any, of these 
requirements were met. 

Most importantly a clear justification for the war in Iraq was never 
sufficiently made by Tony Blair - for the intelligence he presented was always 
embarrassingly patchy and inconsistent. What is more, his unequivocal statement 
to the House of Commons that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass 
destruction that could be used within 45 minutes was made without being 
properly validated - for it was decided in Washington and London to launch the 
invasion of Iraq early, on the basis of the flimsy evidence available. This was 
done without asking the UN weapons inspectors, who were actually on the ground 
in Iraq, to investigate this allegation. Ultimately, as the inspectors 
suspected and as we now all know, it turned out that there were no such 
weapons. Britain had been led into war on false pretences. It was a war that 
was to unleash untold suffering on the Iraqi people and cause grave damage to 
the west's prospects in the wider war against global terror. 

Nevertheless, today the prime minister seeks to persuade the world that the war 
was justifiable because Saddam Hussein was toppled and there now exists in Iraq 
a slender hope of democracy. The Iraqi elections are a creditable achievement 
by the coalition forces. But it must be remembered that a general election was 
previously held in Iraq in 1956, and within two years the country had fallen 
under military rule. Without adequate security and the necessary democratic 
institutions in place, there are absolutely no long-term guarantees that 
democracy will endure. 

Before the invasion, regime change was never cited as a reason for going to 
war. Indeed, Mr Blair insisted that regime change was not, nor ever could be, a 
reason for going to war. Had such a justification been fully debated in 
parliament, it is exceedingly unlikely that the necessary political support 
would have been forthcoming. It was the apparent need to defend ourselves 
against a dire threat - so vividly described by Mr Blair in the Commons - that 
finally won the political argument. 

During the build-up to war and since, most of the electorate of this country 
have consistently opposed the decision to invade. People have seen their 
political wishes ignored for reasons now proved false. But there has been no 
attempt in parliament to call Mr Blair personally to account for what has 
transpired to be a blunder of enormous strategic significance. It should come 
as no surprise therefore that so many of this country's voters have turned 
their backs on a democratic system they feel has so little credibility and is 
so unresponsive. 

One obvious way of re-engaging these disaffected voters would be for parliament 
to accept that it wrongly supported the war - but only because it believed what 
Mr Blair told them. Now it is clear that parliament was misled by Mr Blair, 
either wittingly or unwittingly, parliament should also call on him for a full 
explanation as to why he went to war. It is not a sufficient excuse for Mr 
Blair to say that he acted in good faith and that his decisions were based on 
the intelligence he had been given. For it is the clear responsibility of 
people in his position to test intelligence. No intelligence can ever be taken 
at face value. Indeed it is negligent so to do. 

Parliament should therefore ascertain how far the prime minister did evaluate 
intelligence regarding WMD and how he assessed the reliability of the many 
sources that provided that intelligence. It should ask him what corroborating 
evidence there was for his specific statement about WMD - and why more use was 
not made of the UN inspectors on the ground in Iraq to test the validity of 
that statement. It should inquire just how much he discounted the mass of 
intelligence that came in from the Iraqi National Congress - a body that had a 
vested interest in removing Saddam from power. The list of possible questions 
is huge and would no doubt be usefully expanded during any hearings. 

Mr Blair is an able barrister who should relish the opportunity to put his side 
of the case. No one can undo the decision to go to war. But the impeachment of 
Mr Blair is now something I believe must happen if we are to rekindle interest 
in the democratic process. 

· General Sir Michael Rose was adjutant general of the British army and 
commander of the UN protection force in Bosnia 

comment@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



***************************************************************************
Berdikusi dg Santun & Elegan, dg Semangat Persahabatan. Menuju Indonesia yg 
Lebih Baik, in Commonality & Shared Destiny. 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia
***************************************************************************
__________________________________________________________________________
Mohon Perhatian:

1. Harap tdk. memposting/reply yg menyinggung SARA (kecuali sbg otokritik)
2. Pesan yg akan direply harap dihapus, kecuali yg akan dikomentari.
3. Reading only, http://dear.to/ppi 
4. Satu email perhari: ppiindia-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
5. No-email/web only: ppiindia-nomail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
6. kembali menerima email: ppiindia-normal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    ppiindia-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


** Forum Nasional Indonesia PPI India Mailing List **
** Untuk bergabung dg Milis Nasional kunjungi: 
** Situs Milis: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia/ **
** Beasiswa dalam negeri dan luar negeri S1 S2 S3 dan post-doctoral 
scholarship, kunjungi 
http://informasi-beasiswa.blogspot.com **

Other related posts:

  • » [nasional_list] [ppiindia] Enough of his excuses: Blair must be impeached over Iraq