[nanomsg] Re: ws transport
- From: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2014 07:36:36 +0100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 29/11/14 23:48, Andrew Starks wrote:
> That's why I wonder (not assert) if a small service in the middle
> (a broker?) couldn't server as a layer in between the two
> technologies. A custom ws client could be integrated into the
> broker, and then the destinction may loose meaning, except that
> connections through ws must be marshaled through one or more of
> these....
You mean something like ZeroGW or Maongrel2, right?
Sure, why not, it's totally doable, but why not have ws support
directly in the lib also?
Choice is good.
Martin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUerr0AAoJENTpVjxCNN9Y8qMH/iJtetHqFGwqGPKXTSknLsx1
ONIIz6CHoWauOBl9BxO/mRwzymGCqLMROLfEtSuUbV+XkDq7mJfzqZ/GnTAp3z7O
HWQSp6GyYgko9bSYec0jLOHDzRsv3QPzx8xzErA8c3EToyKjI29qwDoBxGAKPbgO
nSQudxqRSNaBAMU93PeR3d4DmvN++pH4EhOR019WBLU/J/ndmSY5VW1XSUWxqhIb
WGPskKyga2G7cFgiOmQi7oC+vDnlnA8+ocsJHYJ3Y7tHvi+6QWmEluV4iYgQJUvj
wTYHuIYa9aQAC3Gfc0ye1UGCiqU4L6kOGrkflEQiUXVXwU4VN3VlbXEUF8OfOxo=
=gVEo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Other related posts:
