[nanomsg] Re: why memcpy data to be sent?

  • From: Paul Colomiets <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 21:53:57 +0200

Hi Alex,

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Alex Elsayed <eternaleye@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The points people have been bringing up against it - zero-copy not being
> worth it under 512K, etc - are mostly from the crossing-protection-domains
> type.
>

So do you suggest that zero-copy between _layers_ make sense on larger
or smaller messages?

-- 
Paul

Other related posts: