[nanomsg] Re: nn_req extension
- From: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 11:16:35 +0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 05/06/14 11:02, Drew Crawford wrote:
> IMO req/rep structs etc. should move to an internal header file as
> xreq/xrep are.
Sure, go on and do it.
I haven't done it as I haven't anticipated anyone would try to extend
the existing implementation of req/rep to create a new protocol.
Martin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTkDVzAAoJENTpVjxCNN9YCu4IAJhY5NXIDr7XcW/xZC2Bp3XL
nkhxz7TJnPXSWwswW6pOW/CyNL6P6BQMc3wcKUWkj8HPIDj5iwlIGG+csVj7YRWV
IFIIMIpLUjuom4AUsCLPdiCNzNcuQ+biHbP5v+Is+HpHyfmhU7PMvEDVlSP9LwLO
9F3AXtZFpzX2/+h+Of7t4RawwLLrYG2iTdHyn52PDmZbHaG57rCfelrDxdFLvqyl
igKfVa5j/0/1n8s9PrWmiC2IAGOjPgnfBHPDu1RC6wxkACNVmcSZkr3ebNVMAFfi
EwBJaB9Ymfvun17lOjWaFQ4EFdE/sCkj2L3dZsRdSlrEaDcR0OyCWgOmnQZTqRA=
=kagU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Other related posts:
