You have the ability to fork a clone and continue that way if using a different
git hosting service is too onerous.
I get that github is convenient. However since they are no longer interested in
being an apolitical platform for technical collaboration but are instead using
their resources to prosecute a war that I do not feel I can support (a war
against my own class by the way!), I feel compelled to move somewhere else,
where I can focus on software rather than worry about the political or social
ramifications.
Unlike nanomsg, mangos is my project and I'm it's BDFL. If that bugs you, too
bad. The license says you can fork it, keep another copy where you want, etc.
I'm not taking away any of your rights (arguably I cannot as there are multiple
contributors, and I have no interest anyway.) I am however exercising my own
rights.
Put another way - the move is happening and it's not up for debate.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 26, 2016, at 5:40 AM, George Lambert <marchon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I agree and think that since there are multiple contributors who have
contributed to github - that a copy of the project as is should always be
left of github.
G
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <dirkjan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Bent Cardan <bent@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I feel I owe some follow up here.
Thanks for following up with a reasoned explanation of your concerns!
Cheers,
Dirkjan
--
P THINK BEFORE PRINTING: is it really necessary?
This e-mail and its attachments are confidential and solely for the
intended addressee(s). Do not share or use them without approval. If received
in error, contact the sender
and delete them.
