[nanomsg] Re: issue with "received" message size
- From: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Garrett D'Amore <garrett@xxxxxxxxxx>, nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 07:27:38 +0100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 11/03/14 07:21, Martin Sustrik wrote:
> As for my thoughts on port sharing, have a look here:
> http://250bpm.com/blog:18
Specifically, look at "sharing a port" section.
> In the long run we should strive for something like that, but it's
> kind of functionality that logically belongs to the kernel and it
> is not trivial to implement in the user space.
Martin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTHqzaAAoJENTpVjxCNN9YOy4H/AkXjTIdhX6/nR8N99+9VafP
svP+ullge0fB38N19ZTWRmjMAbnAHvBIrsNrugd6fuTcFPqX0M2NsfWwZeBOgQke
Oant4kIfcC4ayxfuXnxV6r4mRVKH5lR42oC1G4snZYuUZGrvxpryisw7AY76HKRz
E6BmQVTXLcVIZ6nc9tcy4ViiMYFfsKt+gXOer6B3Ielq8DVkx9Mg4eFUdhPdg2dL
XUo823YPbr2UUQ+ISfdzjuDkXyaWwnMY4G+9RyRlStQQEnnam0WBxGGDvi8ZU+st
Rgva0EQAsYHLk/oGngGUs1nOi0Js8FWxtNagVzr1bV+aoetpa/N7TPN/5Asn4WQ=
=qb4D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Other related posts:
