[nanomsg] Re: initial code repo for Go version of SP protocols
- From: Vasiliy Tolstov <v.tolstov@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 07:11:36 +0400
Very good, thanks! Does it possible to get this working on udp protocol?
2014-03-24 5:10 GMT+04:00 Garrett D'Amore <garrett@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> All,
>
> I’ve finished some debugging, and am now ready to announce the first public
> release of my SP protocol implementation in pure Go.
>
> https://bitbucket.org/gdamore/sp
>
> There’s also documentation here: https://godoc.org/bitbucket.org/gdamore/sp
>
> This is licensed under Apache License 2.0
>
> This is *VERY* preliminary. In particular, I’ve only implemented REP, REQ,
> XREP, XREQ over TCP and IPC at this point. (I’ve not tested interop between
> nanomsg with IPC yet, but it seems to work with TCP, and I’d be somewhat
> surprised if it doesn’t just work with IPC.) The implementation of each of
> those protocols is only about 100 lines each. The implementation of IPC and
> TCP are also only about 100 lines each. (Admittedly, they make use of a
> common core that is a little bit larger, but I expect TLS to only require
> about 100-150 lines. Including whitespace and comments. :-)
>
> I will probably implement Pub / Sub in the next day or so. I expect few if
> any challenges there. I’ll have to provide a trie, and I was somewhat
> surprised to see that nanomsg handles the subscription filters on the
> subscriber side rather than the publisher. (I guess this makes much less
> work for the publisher to keep track of things, and a vastly simpler
> protocol, but it also assumes network bandwidth is cheap. It would work
> better over a true broadcast/multicast medium too.)
>
> The IPC also only supports Unix like operating systems. golang has no native
> support for named pipes, and I don’t have a Microsoft platform to test any
> implementation on, even if I were tempted to write one myself (and to be
> honest, I’m not. :-)
>
> I would appreciate any *useful* feedback anyone might have. The bitbucket
> repo has a tracker. For the moment the issue tracker accepts anonymous
> posts. (Until such time as I get spam and have to disable anonymous issue
> posting. :-)
>
> I’d also welcome any collaboration, if folks here want to contribute.
>
> - Garrett
>
>
--
Vasiliy Tolstov,
e-mail: v.tolstov@xxxxxxxxx
jabber: vase@xxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
