Hi Laurent, On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Laurent Alebarde <l.alebarde@xxxxxxx> wrote: > That made me redevelop my security stack in a separate library, independent > from libzmq. So now, I can choose libzmq or nanomsg or whatever. I have a > simple API that do not require integration with the messaging library, and > that work only on buffers : > > receive_handcheck_message > send_handcheck_message > is_handcheck_finished > encode > decode > Yes. This kinda thing that's easy to implement in nanomsg itself. But, how this works? I.e. is it symmetric encryption with single shared key? -- Paul