[nanomsg] Re: end-to-end security

  • From: Paul Colomiets <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 22:48:17 +0200

Hi Laurent,

On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Laurent Alebarde <l.alebarde@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> That made me redevelop my security stack in a separate library, independent
> from libzmq. So now, I can choose libzmq or nanomsg or whatever. I have a
> simple API that do not require integration with the messaging library, and
> that work only on buffers :
>
> receive_handcheck_message
> send_handcheck_message
> is_handcheck_finished
> encode
> decode
>

Yes. This kinda thing that's easy to implement in nanomsg itself.
But, how this works? I.e. is it symmetric encryption with single
shared key?

--
Paul

Other related posts: