[nanomsg] Re: benchmarks
- From: Dustin Chapman <dustin.r.chapman@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 10:48:30 -0500
Link copy missed one character --
s/htm/html/
On Feb 14, 2015 10:42 AM, "Garrett D'Amore" <garrett@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> They were very rough numbers. There are performance tests in both nanomsg
> and mangos. Note that those tests were performed agains older versions of
> both. There were newer numbers I posted on my blog and mangos now performs
> much better and very very close to nanomsg itself. In some cases even
> better.
>
> See this http://garrett.damore.org/2014/04/sp-protocols-improved-again.htm
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Feb 14, 2015, at 2:33 AM, Drew Crawford <drew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> Are there any benchmarks published for nanomsg / mangos?
>
> As is sort of an open secret I’m working on a new speed-focused
> implementation of some of the SP protocols. I got the tests passing on the
> first few pieces of my architecture today and measured some initial
> timings. However I don’t really have a standard of comparison to know “am
> I fast yet” and by how much.
>
> I did dig up
> http://itnewscast.com/servers-storage/early-performance-numbers but that
> is old and leaves out some key details (like what is an “op” and what kind
> of hardware was used).
>
> However if those are the current order-of-magnitude timings for req/rep on
> modern Intel hardware then let’s just say I’m a happy camper...
>
>
Other related posts:
