[nanomsg] Re: benchmarks
- From: Garrett D'Amore <garrett@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 07:42:19 -0800
They were very rough numbers. There are performance tests in both nanomsg and
mangos. Note that those tests were performed agains older versions of both.
There were newer numbers I posted on my blog and mangos now performs much
better and very very close to nanomsg itself. In some cases even better.
See this http://garrett.damore.org/2014/04/sp-protocols-improved-again.htm
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 14, 2015, at 2:33 AM, Drew Crawford <drew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Are there any benchmarks published for nanomsg / mangos?
>
> As is sort of an open secret I’m working on a new speed-focused
> implementation of some of the SP protocols. I got the tests passing on the
> first few pieces of my architecture today and measured some initial timings.
> However I don’t really have a standard of comparison to know “am I fast yet”
> and by how much.
>
> I did dig up http://itnewscast.com/servers-storage/early-performance-numbers
> but that is old and leaves out some key details (like what is an “op” and
> what kind of hardware was used).
>
> However if those are the current order-of-magnitude timings for req/rep on
> modern Intel hardware then let’s just say I’m a happy camper...
Other related posts:
