[nanomsg] Re: Where "Channel ID" are managed in the code ?
- From: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 15:30:57 +0100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 13/01/14 15:23, Laurent Alebarde wrote:
> Typically, the whole server is stateless, but it is cheaper that a
> client remains with the same server. So I will assign to each
> client a default server and different fallbacks.
That makes perfect sense. In fact, it's still the same stateless
approach (in principle at least) and server just manages redirecting
similar requests to similar workers to take advantages on any cached data.
If you're patch is generic enough we can even merge it to nanomsg to
be switched on by a socket option or such.
Martin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS0/ihAAoJENTpVjxCNN9YhA8H/3ry0hisKcu2ePKyzu2qMnpf
cROPiS+OG5xNTFE0jw6sxrvOxGiMrJ70mQ5rNdpBSxDPEhFEFFFdSDcIEQhaKwml
TQ0oknvv6cNZbS2XfsxcVfb/B3Aj4+TuVw/ydQmpZT09aJywv0zjX1BxNcsQclX3
24klderxoPqVJhK+3m8ex8Mb2nT5Abb1Y/gidDxGGoNH3AxtDxUAOhTTtwOffYos
Wub7+UVNlFgCHV1/tnDLnL1KSukt2Wi60y8rSfJPa4nbUrUxhG4tBfE2ORtiTLlH
lkwtF4JBH+ci7N8t3wie7+L/4hha45ZouKEkXvUdaW1hLXPpygGD8QFANQpObP0=
=w776
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Other related posts:
