[nanomsg] Re: Where "Channel ID" are managed in the code ?

  • From: Laurent Alebarde <l.alebarde@xxxxxxx>
  • To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 09:03:08 +0100

I may be wrong, but I think at this point: no. It is like a 0MQ ROUTER/ROUTER architecture for the proxy. The proxy when it sends a message to the worker shall attach a backtrack it has built from its client/worker pairing map.


Le 16/01/2014 05:56, Martin Sustrik a écrit :
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 15/01/14 16:09, Laurent Alebarde wrote:

Let's recall my architecture:

-------------- server ------------------ client (REQ) ----------
(REP) proxy (REP) ---------- (REP) worker socket names REP_PC
REP_PW           REP_W
It should look like this:

client (REQ) ---------- (REP) proxy (REQ) ---------- (REP) worker

No?

Martin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS12aYAAoJENTpVjxCNN9YUiAIAJ1OXDb1ILa/erGovRlMf0t1
lYnKLz3KZ4ke1+TrzW5mR+/PxV8fD420Em1CFY5WSJf73gbZXFC7SjkZhyaNqJbU
oep6YWnpsvCbbzP4oikk+wuUYUukORABqz9d+6dp4EoFNpEg0ASmErce5jI/K3gj
+gPS2pkkicR8enS2vzG91lX+ddiQ3NheDfFg0GvVNR5RLwupegLIiWWFhe6Kv2mL
J2+Y0ss/Uc9+Z0iSNSnM5hUpoAABtjHyJ9r0FM7bwTx5x/ULMg7AJuO5/4WA+Nvx
VciaA31uUn1uLfkEqBPBDiPTUe8lydJrPbgRvnj7hmUVWnnPcgn/kQ3DtNEOLlU=
=FevI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Other related posts: