[nanomsg] Re: UDP & TLS RFCs
- From: Garrett D'Amore <garrett@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Alex Elsayed <eternaleye@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 15:28:17 -0700
That would not be a terrible way to recast the specs. Although, I think it
might come about that we need or want to handle more details than just stream
vs datagram semantics on some transports. For example, imagine websocket,
where we might want to specify some things that are neither covered by
websocket itself nor by the generic SP over STREAM bits. (In particular, for
websocket, we might want to have a way to select from different “applications”
as part of the early websocket negotiation.)
I do agree with your earlier idea that tls+tcp:// seems like a good way to
specify this scheme. I’ll go ahead and change my implementation to do that.
I think we need to include the syntax of these “addresses” as part of the RFCs,
so that different applications or implementations can exchange them.
--
Garrett D'Amore
Sent with Airmail
On March 24, 2014 at 3:22:50 PM, Alex Elsayed (eternaleye@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:
One thing I'd wonder is if TCP/TLS/UDP are the right thing to key the
specification on - what actually seems to be _relevant_ is "SP over
transports with SOCK_STREAM semantics" and "SP over transports with
SOCK_DGRAM semantics" - that then covers TCP, TCP+TLS, AF_UNIX SOCK_STREAM
(IPC), IPC+TLS, UDP, UDP+DTLS, etc.
Martin Sustrik wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've added first drafts of UDP and TLS RFCs into the rfc subdirectory.
> Feel free to comment.
>
> Garrett, you'll probably want to make yourself the editor of the TLS
> draft. I don't have enough experience in the area to make a sane
> editor of that document.
>
> As for generating the txts from xmls I am at the moment using online
> xml.resource.org tool. Later on we can add xml2rfc to the build process.
>
> Also note that I've added the RFCs to the nanomsg package.
>
> Martin
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTL8uaAAoJENTpVjxCNN9Y7j4H/0mfcV8UsKuJuCzitWoM8puH
> RdQGvHJCaZCAlWcjogUQis+NTSEO5UlasCpqG9jsq57o0Rt5ZnDytvqHPDLfBXmB
> DsBghtDyufr3GC7L6G/EApQKCjn/+LfmHETiGUhAT2mUX0yGFulP4oc5RWbawzB0
> AGEL3OdZELonOSV4G9QcPskbUaatD4jjhEcjG76LqXE3TC58B30yKxIKZrFRla/S
> Zs9LMGAiBdMd8qJf5ymBsot0geu2Ej2K73P9/0pS9pa1roKcNLUOt0n8h/j4XdUz
> HsXwV0u4mmc7aw1xmP8p8mrMvGGgeHUaXmKAsXPGE5qJDwBhp2tbTPtS2rsXxj4=
> =xHyP
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Other related posts:
