Hi, I've just published first version of nanoconfig. https://github.com/tailhook/nanoconfig It basically works. There is a high chance of hitting bug #114, will try to fix it soon. We should eventually recommend all language bindings to support it out of the box. The C API is just as simple as: nc_configure(sock, "nanoconfig://topology"); nc_close(sock); The `nc_close` replaces `nn_close` because the real processing is done inside separate thread, so the socket must be closed inside that thread too. The exact name service to use is configured by environment: NN_CONFIG_SERVICE=ipc:///run/nnconfig.sock NN_CONFIG_UPDATES=ipc:///run/nnupdates.sock For language bindings I'd recommend to add `configure` method to the socket, that automatically switches destructor to use `nc_close` instead `nn_close`. I'm also thinking about nicer API like: sock.config("topology", {"role": "client", "pid": getpid()}) => nn_configure ("nanoconfig://topology?role=client&pid=1234") Thoughts? I'd like project to be moved to nanomsg organization, to encourage more people to experiment with it. -- Paul