[nanomsg] Re: The monitoring for nanomsg

  • From: Paul Colomiets <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 13:37:27 +0300

Hi Martin,

On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 05/09/13 11:04, Schmurfy wrote:
>>
>> When you say that admin and library api should be separated do you mean
>> having them provide two sets of apis or to have the library provide
>> hooks for the admin part and keep both projects separate ?
>
>
> Given that the admin rarely sits inside of the application, I would say the
> admin interface should be a protocol built on top of IPC or TCP.
>

Why not go a step further and build it on top of nanomsg?

-- 
Paul

Other related posts: