[nanomsg] Re: The monitoring for nanomsg
- From: Schmurfy <schmurfy@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 11:04:12 +0200
When you say that admin and library api should be separated do you mean
having them provide two sets of apis or to have the library provide hooks
for the admin part and keep both projects separate ?
On 5 September 2013 09:31, Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 05/09/13 09:28, Paul Baxter wrote:
>
> I think what's been described as part of a distributed management
>> capability is excellent, but I'm not sure it should be part of nanomsg
>> itself. Perhaps a nanomgr project :)
>>
>> Perhaps nanomsg could provide some hooks to query queue sizes,
>> connection states, but from reading some past posts I got the
>> impression Martin wasn't so keen on providing these.
>>
>
> These should be definitely provided.
>
> However the key is to keep user interface (the library API) and admin
> interface fully separate.
>
> Martin
>
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
