[nanomsg] Re: Testing on QNX 6.5.0
- From: Hajime Saito <emijah.s@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 15:41:49 +0900
Okay, I'll try sending you a pull request.
Yes, the other problems are something different.
2014-05-16 15:33 GMT+09:00 Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 16/05/14 04:12, Hajime Saito wrote:
>
>> I found that the mutex causing the trouble was being initialized
>> in nn_global_init through the call, nn_ctx_init. The function
>> nn_global_term does not have a matching call to nn_ctx_term.
>
> Good catch! That's definetely a bug. Would you mind providing a patch?
> If some remaining tests are failing on QNX, it's probably a different
> problem and should be treated separately.
>
> Martin
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTdbFDAAoJENTpVjxCNN9YJO0IAKL/Al1/2GEdTFwaCDIstJkT
> 05oQem5DOgj2KfZ04hLkqZU2togYth71CymnfoyoUJUZrjXMw4vfkNEqCvV3naQx
> xjRYPgzVSDTEihW32v62dZ+BqB4wu+Uszns+ZwUvhPUkOM/5DyQ/LEjh9EMaXOhT
> dhY9tqByQYTf9N0BR3aE9LAwAV+zgWwzealWIL7b4zcjss0OzsAe8I1lEv+n0gpP
> nzaGrz8YlfP1XKeNj2mWpQVE4dpR7Ic/hNsrfWtfgndaCfc2oRZSJniTbox3HbJQ
> RzqOdo7kUvpMCx/B1QKpMAzJhuYIjT/XpOCZlxTsgKpG1/u5nQ28gkGUt4QPCLI=
> =glCC
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
Other related posts:
