[nanomsg] Re: Persisted reliable messaging
- From: Jörg Singler <joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 10:59:46 +0100
Hi,
that nanomsg is a pure networking library is clear for me. I played around
with it already. Alright. So let's say you have an internal message bus
implemented via the Pub/Sub pattern (because you want to leverage the
subscriptions). It is ok that the bus is in terms of crashes somehow atomic
(either it works completely or not at all). Some of the subscribers are
communicating with external systems and here you want to have more
reliability (with persistence). if I get you right: your answer would be
not to use nanomsg at all (at least for the communication to the external
system), right?
Best, Joerg
2013/11/22 Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi Joerg,
>
> > has anyone of you already worked with persisted reliable messaging
> > so that the queue is more or less stored in files or in a database.
> > The goal would be that you can recover and restart after a crash
> > and none of the messages are lost.
>
> nanomsg is purely networking library and doesn't touch the disk at
> all. You should look at RabbitMQ, ActiveMQ or a similar centralised
> messaging system.
>
> Martin
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSjyNOAAoJENTpVjxCNN9Y0xoH/i5/7AqWyjxafmlOXFuDr2Qm
> h5JkXvQ6Cq3Wb0aOonHbje1leqgCy+HX0rUauf5yp33AjpeiVpHTdCD/mHRxx12j
> DD/zzIeRqGjJxuwfX9WpqOBnVBWK+XzpMB/7oUfrxU8iJC+OuBs7XIJIrETb9oIt
> O5Y9MJ+ugkefhjHx3UqYvAqTjkXPIRkZ1dULWYdMkU5fwHZ2f9bpBdiKuuoaaA6T
> IgjE9EZDiAazMR1wUxsKBtTQwWOXqJYAh7NNdp4NnvwQWANuBtJ7xJztGoc1PKPu
> /5pBXHnrXMsbBwXQvSJJzRo1GL6G1YdfK+1JNXWXmZOGhM4j04XbGXKVQoz27sU=
> =YUUz
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
Other related posts:
