[nanomsg] Re: NN_SNDBUF on inproc
- From: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 09:09:43 +0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 09/10/14 00:33, Paul Colomiets wrote:
> From unix(7) on linux it seems quite opposite:
>
>> The SO_SNDBUF socket option does have an effect for UNIX
>> domain sockets, but the SO_RCVBUF option does not.
Oops. You are right, it's the other way round.
Marin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUNjS3AAoJENTpVjxCNN9YSQMIAKbj7YDF0D9vUqrwZJz8qzOq
QI6eVkJv1qm7yQvwWfHSXm2KaH4vs19qLdUDOHNqaFMKV3CLCSmHOGYuVO3ej3HM
SLmD00xnG9VOrzqDq8kyUTErG1wVpBivgPDs3dTdVY8RdESJuIPFUrA2YIIqvujA
8Vdzcc1IJExw/1mrJeZLemPag+N80kLPDHlRH2tovr+7B/aVf2cq9ErO0GfzQ2we
cvfwd/3Jp46McIr0wBugxEXiHUDGH+GL0H09VYNCtGofvFjMA/CZaCSj6bAzuK/U
Rn6eTd2P7VdecJG9snoSiHgueAV8sqZcOdZqMJnSPUJhHthtkWIRsxEoIJfCrfk=
=J5oN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Other related posts:
