[nanomsg] Re: NAT transport
- From: Jay Berg <jaybny@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 18:39:05 -0700
for some applications this really is not a big deal.. high frequency
trading price feeds are all UDP. using check-sums and higher level
protocols such as FIX can resolve any missed data.
as long as both sides are running the same protocol with defined timeouts,
reply/requests and handshakes, UDP communication is just fine. isn't
µTorrent all UDP?
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Matthew Hall <mhall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 04:45:46PM -0700, Jay Berg wrote:
> > nanomsg protocols also work with ipc and inproc, so there is a higher
> level
> > abstraction here. all that we would need is to decorate UDP to this
> > abstraction / interface.
>
> IPC and INPROC don't have loss / drop, reorder, corruption,
> retransmission, or
> segmentation issues. Network traffic does.
>
> Matthew.
>
>
--
PGP: http://bit.ly/1gjvndi
Other related posts:
