[nanomsg] NAT transport

  • From: Jay Berg <jaybny@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 08:47:26 -0700

Hi Martin,

To use nanomsg when both sides are behind a NAT, we will have to implement
a new nanomsg transport.

From what I understand, NAT hole-punching is more reliable using UDP vs
TCP.

Would the nanomsg protocals all work with a UDP transport?

Thanks
Jay

Other related posts: