[nanomsg] Re: Moving forward
- From: Garrett D'Amore <garrett@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 16:34:32 -0700
> On Mar 18, 2015, at 2:38 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman <dirkjan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 10:20 PM, Garrett D'Amore <garrett@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> a) Martin suddenly renews his interest and activity in the project, and
>> reasserts control and leadership.
>>
>> b) The community (working with Martin’s consent), appoints some additional
>> leadership, who can be called upon to provide technical leadership to keep
>> the project moving forward. (Indeed, I think this is similar to what
>> happened with ØMQ.)
>>
>> c) A new fork is started from nanomsg.
>
> I'd like to see (b) happen, where we start by adding you as an
> additional maintainer for the current nanomsg project (though that
> would be quite different from how I experienced what happened with
> 0MQ). If that somehow doesn't happen, I'd certainly consider using
> your fork for any future projects where I need something nanomsg-like.
Well, I’m agreeable if we can get Martin engaged. If not, then I think we need
to fork.
- Garrett
Other related posts:
