[nanomsg] Re: Monitoring, another approach
- From: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2013 07:49:29 +0200
On 14/09/13 23:57, Paul Colomiets wrote:
Then internally, it's a set of counters in socket structure. And a
single error state per socket.
Can we agree on this?
The errors should definitely exist on per-connection basis. Which means
1 error per endpoint -- on the connecting side; not sure about the
binding side.
I guess there may be also some errors on nanomsg socket level, although
I cannot think of one atm.
As for statistics, I would say one set of counters per nanomsg socket
should do. Going down to the per-connection level may be an overkill.
Martin
Other related posts:
