[nanomsg] Re: MIT Licensing
- From: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 09:19:32 +0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi Garrett,
> Well, I'm not the package maintainers. But for those packages that
> I do maintain (illumos, mangos, etc.) I ask that contributors
> update the copyright statements in the files that they are updating
> as part of their patch submission.
Are you sure it works that way? I am not a lawyer, but my feeling is
that claiming a copyright on the file doesn't necessarily mean you are
providing your patched under the MIT license...
Martin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTiDEEAAoJENTpVjxCNN9Y9VwH/28ihWcGHbvgVIBTA5H2hzOk
mKty/GLUtt2qRMm9oo7Hu5nmCyI6JxMtd4RCLs8Wz11RdTPTLs0N3+iPMfI7ZNhc
Rf3uv/9l6sC6uamCC5EsZByrqYenGKDOG72UOxdFuixx66Wo1bH71niqK5cKF0Ti
9IxB8LL5t21bXZrcOc1MPYoc/f5Mz1zerqjjxWQL844lycSZzIfNNy0bNSrqf8TZ
dTvN/Tw3mc6T6d+ck+yqvdXOpZqnRam961XIiN6OVDyKMPEYWPAfrC+0xiL51k/l
EXKGs3uezaLPfzFwvy0QQoN7VefHqx1vdibyN0dI3H2sii6/CPR4rKHbW0QQ2Yg=
=BJT/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Other related posts:
