[nanomsg] Re: MIT Licensing
- From: "Garrett D'Amore" <garrett@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 17:20:26 -0700
Well, I'm not the package maintainers. But for those packages that I do
maintain (illumos, mangos, etc.) I ask that contributors update the
copyright statements in the files that they are updating as part of their
patch submission.
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Hajime Saito <emijah.s@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> So you prefer we send patches?
>
>
> 2014-05-30 3:22 GMT+09:00 Garrett D'Amore <garrett@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> > IMO, the best way to make this assertion is to actually add your name to
> the
> > end of the license / copyright statement. This makes both your own
> > copyright and the fact of your license grant clear to future
> contributors or
> > consumers. Statements made in mailing list are harder to find, harder to
> > prove, and harder to enforce in any kind of a legal setting where it may
> be
> > necessary to do so.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Stan Mihai <stanmihai4@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Same here, all my future contributions to nanomsg, unless stated
> >> otherwise, are licensed under MIT/X11 license.
> >>
> >>
> >> On 29 May 2014 20:16, Achille Roussel <achille.roussel@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> All my future conributions to nanomsg, unless stated otherwise, are
> >>> licensed under MIT/X11 license.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers!
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
Other related posts:
