[nanomsg] Re: How is security going to be implemented in nanomsg?
- From: crocket <crockabiscuit@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 20:48:56 +0900
I personally do not like TLS for authentication because maintaining
TLS certificates has been a nightmare for sysadmins like me.
I was pretty much impressed by ZeroMQ authentication when I read
pieter's blog articles.
I also thought about using ZeroMQ authentication for website logins,
but public key authentication looked too complex for ordinary facebook
users to use.
Do you think secure authentication is a good idea for nanomsg? If it
is so, how would you want to implement authentication in nanomsg?
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 14/06/14 11:31, crocket wrote:
>> I read about SSL/TLS security in this mailing list before. Which
>> security mechanisms do people have in mind?
>
> The discussion was in context of hop-by-hop encryption of data passed
> over TCP connections.
>
> Martin
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTnBqMAAoJENTpVjxCNN9YyBsH/ilUrlUW8Q2odqf5vaWlRgtA
> d+2/tFOcFTngw1Mi0lYa0XFiLvo6TTJypnJcCQdv3MsrCJzrryfTuRiJRnlEqvGM
> f3LsUBSjFX4yoqvcB8E039G+GM8frLhpYajg9vlobLyb73vnbjkHFPvw3yAENNNF
> ygNoY4Q+oZVZT2ilFJ7ecQt6EVuwUdA0H8fhyuPfAWzxOlGFccUzTPELs4TLZg4+
> yBeq3sUlYoClJVLkQaKqpZpfUIGEEVP0rWk4pC4u6CdhZgoFLMfrDErBGhDUSpO1
> 9zpa1DA2GeITEKGyAU8IkUvwlxbI2lV+Suy25Qr/bIsqkl96h4r5PmoOKiInS3U=
> =7pUr
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
Other related posts:
