-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Thomas, > I'm trying out nanomsg (with nanomsgxx) as an alternative to > zeromq. I only have one issue: I was wondering is nanomsg offers to > bind a random port and then later access to the binded port ? In > another word, is there any equivalent to ZMQ_LAST_ENDPOINT? No. There's no way to do that. The functionality can't possibly work in a generic way. Consider wi-fi interfaces. They come and go depending on whether wi-fi is avialable or not. So, nanomsg has to re-bind each time the interface becomes available (not done yet but under works afaik). So, each time it gets a different ephemeral port number. - From user's point of view it means that the port number changes silently at random times and that you can't depend on the value retrieved via ZMQ_LAST_ENDPOINT. Not a good problem to have. Martin -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTjFZeAAoJENTpVjxCNN9Y15EH/26oYKChAvPLA6u0kGnfb+5p RTR/IBm+bhWCa7oyN9sj5HsvWwZOzBcYdf2icWnz+fqJk9Vw0ge2uhiZpdjD3XKp ccnzdel25oTBatnwxWllMr9ezVgrD4yNcYUDv3RAbnFetuGsqUTrDNS9+9LmLwVa oc577/MnIhINsBVnNnOKNckco1uVYGjrb1e5d/9RhhmBia4sErRKGUtFqld5W7Og AL49WtUR/nvT1MBZamN9wGZh2dCXmkFEmPz/JvRU9+M4uzCYbL6+TPwquY7B2J6W HEuwm8cCXWN9HXh5Zw+lGNSs+b9pkJT6iInFSgFfKZfCo3NYp8CBoDo+7w2Tl6s= =wQgS -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----