[nama] Re: remove_track safety, strange behaviours

On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:56:57AM -1000, Joel Roth wrote:
> > 1. remove_track should require an argument to make it mistake-proof.
> 
> I've patched it another way, asking for a user confirmation.
> 
>       remove track $name? [n] 
> 
> For the old behavior, set in namarc: quietly_remove_tracks: 1
> 
> 
> > 2. When failing to generate a valid chainsetup, nama should refuse to
> >    start playback.
> 
> Done.
> 
> 
> > 3. When importing audio, the appropriate track should probably be
> >    siwtched to monitor mode, since it seems in the spirit of import_audio.
> 
> Done, with a warning if the bus is OFF.
> 
> > 4. Nama should probably stop engine playback upon quiting.
> 
> Please notice if this happens regularly.
> 
> And please keep speaking up, even if you don't get a
> response right away. :-)
Thanks, you're amazing!

make test fails on the current branch:
"t/12_nama.t ....
Dubious, test returned 25 (wstat 6400, 0x1900)"

...was passing fine day before yesterday.

Cheers,
S.M.

> 
> Joel
> 
> 
> > Cheers,
> > S.M.
> > 
> > 
> > >   Kindly yours
> > >           Julien
> > > 
> > > --------
> > > Music was my first love and it will be my last (John Miles)
> > > 
> > > ======== FIND MY WEB-PROJECT AT: ========
> > > http://ltsb.sourceforge.net
> > > the Linux TextBased Studio guide
> > > ======= AND MY PERSONAL PAGES AT: =======
> > > http://www.juliencoder.de
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Joel Roth
> 
>

Other related posts: